|
|
East London Cyclist Archives
The newsletter of Tower Hamlets London Cycling Campaign Group
February - March 2000
Your cycling officer has his say
It was about time the borough had a chance to give their side of the local transport story. We asked Gwyne Owen, our cycling officer, to put a few words down for us...
Well, I've now been in post for nine months and feel relatively settled. Although a resident of Lambeth, I had previously worked in Tower Hamlets at an Express Parcel company, and hence had a reasonable knowledge of the Borough, and of cycling facilities in particular. In the past I had also been a member of the Lambeth LCC. Having cycled extensively in London over the last 13 years, I have developed my own views on what I believe cyclists require. It's certainly been quite a busy time. In addition to the usual London Cycle Network work, we are also closely involved with Sustrans in developing the Millennium Route through the Borough, we've launched a Cycle Strategy Consultation Document (results in the next few months), and a new edition of the Cycle Map which you should receive with this Newsletter. Unfortunately there have been two cycling fatalities in the Borough during this time which shows how much still needs to be done.
As far as the London Cycle Network is concerned, I believe that the previous two to three years have seen the LCN mature into a more genuine Network. Cable St was just being completed as I came into post and this year we are continuing to upgrade the route from Butcher Row to the Borough boundary with Newham. In the meantime much of the Cable St scheme has received unwanted attention from the Statutory Undertakers, (gas, water, electric and more particularly (and in this instance appropriately) the cable companies) who are entitled by law to dig up the road. This has closed sections of the route for periods of time and removed much of the Green Surfacing. Unfortunately they are only obliged to reinstate the exact same type of surfacing after six months, and many of them are working on the basis that another Statutory Undertaker will have dug it up again before this becomes necessary.
We will soon begin work on the A11. A major sustainable transport project, it has received funding not only from the LCN but also from the Traffic Director for London and a certain amount from the European Union. The final detailed design is expected any day, and you should start to see some manifestation of the scheme out on the street during the summer.
As most of you know the A11, and more specifically the junction of Mile End Road and Burdett Road was the scene of a fatal accident involving a cyclist on 24th September. Since the accident the Council, in conjunction with the Wheelers', have met with the father of the deceased and explained what plans were already in existence for the junction (and the A11 as a whole). We also outlined the Borough's involvement in the Don't Be A Space Invader campaign which aims to encourage awareness both on behalf of lorry drivers and cyclists of each other. The date of the inquest has now been set for 5th May. The other fatality at Tower Hill has yet to receive a date from the Coroner, and the details we have received from the Police before the inquest are necessarily rather vague.
We have also received funding to carry out Quality Monitoring work. In effect this is a method of bringing the Network as a whole up to standard. Unfortunately we were the last Borough in London to receive our report from the independent auditors (last week). Quality Monitoring involves an official Consultation process which will involve the Wheelers, but if I can pre-empt this slightly by asking you now if there is anything you think particularly needs attention in the Borough - then get in touch as soon as possible (see contact details below). The funding is in two tranches over the next two years' and what we are aiming to do is the slightly simpler things this year, and perhaps the more complicated things (with necessarily longer lead-in times) next year.
At the present time we have not received precise confirmation from the LCN as to which schemes have received what level of funding for next year. In addition to the A11 and Quality Monitoring we have bid for funds to develop a scheme along Grove Road and Burdett Road. This may seem strange given that we are developing the Sustrans scheme up through Mile End Park but this is being developed purely as a Leisure Route and I believe commuter cyclists will require a far more direct route. The Sustrans route as a whole can be seen in green on the Map, and beginning from the Foot Tunnel connects Millwall, Mile End, and Victoria Parks by the use of towpaths and the new Canary Riverside.
Personally I feel the current level of consultation between the Borough and the Wheelers are relatively healthy. I meet Gary quite regularly, and last week we all had a meeting with the Traffic Director regarding the A11. I should have attended the Wheelers meeting on Wednesday 26th January by the time you read this, but I intend to attend periodically thereafter. So if you're outraged by anything I've had to say, and feel you can't express this through phone or letter - take advantage. In addition any ideas you have for Quality Monitoring will be gratefully considered.
Gwyn Owen
The Cycling Officer
Traffic & Transportation
Council Offices
Southern Grove
London
E3 4PN
Tel: 020 7364 6991
Fax: 020 7364 6668
email: traffic.lbth@dial.pipex.com |
|
Your letters have made a difference...part 2
Following the death of Elizabeth Webb and a lot of your letters arriving at the office of the Traffic Director for London. I was asked to attend a meeting with the borough officers, (mentioned by Gwyne Owen above) and representatives of the TDfL, to discuss the future of bicycle provision on and around the Mile End Road. Assuming sincerity on all parts, I did come away feeling fairly positive about the future for cyclists in Tower Hamlets.
Mark Butland and myself pressed the need to build in provision for cycles and pedestrians, that means expensive street engineering. We highlighted problems like Aldgate gyratory, and Tower Hill. Both of these sites are due to receive attention in the future. I was promised that by April this year, the Royal Mint Street end of the Cable Street route will not expire as it presently does, leaving the west-bound cyclist stranded and facing oncoming traffic.
A toucan crossing will take westbound bikes across Mansell Street into Shorter Street. Southbound bikes will have a separate bus/cycle lane leading onto Tower Bridge. Eastbound cycles from Tower Hill have a harder time, and will still have to travel around the gyratory there, not very good at all. Aldgate gyratory is less satisfactory. There will be advanced stoplines at most of the junctions, but despite our requests, no satisfactory answer has been suggested as yet to assist cycles travelling east and being at risk from cars heading north, requiring drivers to weave across four/five lanes when heading towards Commercial Street.
Lack of parking enforcement in the borough also seems to be an ongoing complaint. The borough's Streetline phone numbers for complaints can be found on the Wheelers home page. |
|
Bet she ain't ridden a bike in years...
Bristol East MP Jean Corston has climbed down over the issue of making helmets compulsory for cyclists after pressure from cycling organisations.
The witless and misguided MP had put forward a Ten-Minute Rule Bill to be read on November 2nd, with the wording "That leave be given to bring a Bill to require cyclists to wear protective headgear; and for connected purposes". Following a meeting with the CTC the Bill has been changed to read "to promote the wearing of protective headgear by cyclists; and for connected purposes".
Stuart Reid, campaigns manager of CTC, Britain's national cycling organisation, welcomed the news. He said: " We feel that any attempt to force the use of cycle helmets using legislation would be misguided and damaging.
"There is no recognised proof that helmets would be effective in the majority of serious cycle accidents. There is however considerable evidence that compulsion would have a devastating effect on public health, by drastically reducing the number of people who cycle. "Neither the CTC, The British Medical Association or the Royal College of General Practitioners are in favour of compulsion. This is a very complex issue that does not lend itself to simplistic solutions. Experts in the areas of cycling and health have found the concept of compulsion to be neither practical nor desirable." |
|
Diary Dates
Next maintenance class:
Peter Steele will be holding a day long class at the workshop on February 20th, there are a couple of places available, £10.00 each, contact Gary on the number below to book. Booking is essential.
History Ride
11.45am Sunday 12th March
Starting outside the Royal London Hospital
A reprise of our own dark ride, 'Rebels and Radicals of the East End', join us for a two hour tour around the haunts of the boroughs finest mischief makers. As featured in The Independent.
£1.00 per person donation to THW. |
|
Borough Cycle Maps
You may or may not, receive a copy of the new borough cycle map (mentioned by Gwyne Owen earlier) with this newsletter. It all depends on the maximum postage weight the LCC allows me. If not, local libraries have copies-free. Or send me a SAE and I'll send you one. Gary |
|
|
...and it's happening there too...
4 January 2000, a US colleague writes...
I heard a couple of months back that a Harris Poll showed something like 60+ percent of the American public favouring mandatory helmet laws, and I knew we'd be in for this...
A colleague called me today to let me know that an insurance industry federation representative is floating a bill for mandatory helmet usage in California. My preliminary response was something along the following:
"Opposing this law would become the highest priority of the California bicycling community. Besides actually banning us from the streets, this is probably the worst bicycling-related policy the state could enact.
"Why? Because a mandatory helmet law would result in a dramatic decrease in bicycle usage (that's exactly what happened in Australia). Because the health benefits of bicycling far outweigh the risks (by a 20-1 factor, says the British Medical Journal). Because there are many other preferable measures that the state could take to increase bicycle safety (Education for motorists and bicyclists, or better street and trail design, to cite two examples)."
There are plenty of other arguments that I kept in reserve. The helmet issue is a bike-safety red-herring, but since everybody seems to enjoy beating each other up on this subject every couple of years, I thought I'd throw in three often neglected details.
1 Helmets are designed for impact sustained by a rider falling down, not for the forces of car-impact.
2 Helmet-laws have nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with transfering liability from the perpetrators to the victims.
3 Pedestrians are taking far more hits than bicyclists. (Pedestrian helmet-law anyone?)
Even worse, stationary-objects, (trees, utility-poles, buildings, etc.) are taking far more hits than bicyclists and pedestrians combined.(!)
Rest assured, it will be far easier to get restrictive bike-laws, than get any education or facilities. |
|
|